ctbg.over-blog.com/
16 Février 2021
Numerous apps available in the Mac App Store have been found to be stealing data from users, including sensitive information and sending it back to the apps' developers. The rash of discoveries occurred following the revelation that the top paid utility app in the store was improperly harvesting user data.
AppleInsider:
Download apps by Malwarebytes, including Malwarebytes Mobile Security. App Store Preview. Utilities More ways to shop: Find an. Malwarebytes says that its software for Mac is able to remove the ransomware, detected as Ransom.OSX.EvilQuest. Encrypted files will require a restore from a backup, though. Malwarebytes said there was a 400 percent increase in threats on Mac devices from 2018 to 2019, and found an average of 11 threats per Mac devices, which about twice the 5.8 average on Windows.
The biggest app of the list is Adware Doctor, which topped the chart for paid utilities in the Mac App Store, before being removed after the reports about it first emerged on Friday. The app claims to remove adware threats from a Mac, including extensions and cookies in browsers, but Patrick Wardle advises the 'cleaning' process involves collecting the browsing history of the user, as well as a list of all running processes, and a list of software downloaded to the Mac.
Following that incident, researchers found other Mac App Store apps sending data back to servers without their users' knowledge or consent. Despite the apps' malicious intent, they managed to get past the stringent app submission process.
MalwareBytes reports that, in some cases, the data is dispatched to servers in China, a country that doesn't require the same stringent storage requirements as the United States or European countries for personal data. In cases like these, it is highly likely the data is being used for malicious purposes.
The apps found ways to get around the restrictions Apple put in place to prevent apps from accessing data they did not have permission to access.
Adware Doctor is a clone of a legitimate app that was from the developer of MalwareBytes for Mac. While the app was removed form the App Store, it returned under another name. MalwareBytes has been in an extended battle to keep clones of the app from the Mac App Store.

Other apps that perform similar underhanded functions include 'Open Any Files,' 'Dr. Antivirus,' and 'Dr. Cleaner.' All of the apps harvested information including the browsing and search history of the Safari, Chrome, and Firefox browsers.
The discovery of these apps calls into question the safety of apps found in the App Store, and whether or not Apple can actually keep users safe by reviewing the apps before they make it into the App Store.
Also questionable is the apparent ability of developers to bring questionable apps back into the store after they've been blocked from the Mac App Store.
MalwareBytes suggests the following:
I strongly encourage you to treat the App Store just like you would any other download location: as potentially dangerous. Be cautious of what you download. A free app from the App Store may seem perfectly innocent and harmless, but if you have to give that app access to any of your data as part of its expected functionality, you can't know how it will use that data. Worse, even if you don't give it access, it may find a loophole and get access to sensitive data anyway.
If you download one of these apps and are now regretting it, you can report the app to Apple:
Malwarebytes, a company that sells anti-malware software, came out with its annual report on the state of malware this week. Screenshot netflix mac. It has fed a bunch of overhyped headlines around the web about malware on the Mac growing rapidly. What it really reveals is that the Mac is increasingly a target for annoying adware apps—which isn't quite the same as malware. Meanwhile, Apple has also been adjusting its policies and adding new features to fight the spread of this stuff.

Malwarebytes reports:
…most Mac threats, and certainly the most prevalent ones of 2019, are families of adware and potentially unwanted programs (PUPs). The most common Mac malware family, OSX.Generic. Suspicious, fell well down the list at 30th place in Mac- specific detections, and hundreds of spots down on a cross-platform threat list.
The key here is to differentiate between adware, PUPs, and malware. The top 29 bad actors tracked by Malwarebytes in 2019 were adware or PUPs, which are annoying and disingenuous but not considered actually harmful. The big new entry in 2019 was called New Tab and is a browser hijacker.
It's worth considering the tools Apple has at its disposal to make the Mac safe from questionable software. First, there's the Mac App Store, which has a rigorous approval process that blocks most or all of the techniques that these sorts of apps use. Occasionally something leaks through, but those mistakes are rare and rapidly corrected. If you're only downloading software from the Mac App Store, you're pretty much safe.
Next is Apple's relatively new notarization process. Sofware developers now have to pass their apps through an automated analysis on an Apple server, and then Apple cryptographically signs the app. Apps that fail some checks can be rejected, and Apple can remotely kill those apps if they are found to be behaving badly.
And then there's Gatekeeper, which scans apps when you launch them and doesn't let them run unless they pass a bunch of checks. Depending on your Mac's security settings, Gatekeeper can prevent the launching of software that doesn't pass muster.
The Malwarebytes report covers the entirety of calendar year 2019, but in November Apple actually stepped up its efforts to identify problematic software and clarified some of its policies to give it wider latitude to shut off software that doesn't quite fit the definition of malware. Apple pointed me to this note to developers that specifies what kinds of software will be considered for removal. There are three kinds:
Now, does this mean that Apple is going to shut down all of those apps that claim to clean your system and keep it running smoothly? Though most Mac experts would suggest that such apps are not really necessary, it's an arguable point—and Apple appears to be erring on the side of allowing apps in that gray area to exist. At least, so long as they don't violate other aspects of its policies. (The FDA doesn't prohibit homeopathic remedies, either.)
It seems that many of the items in Malwarebytes' report have gotten the hammer from Apple and are no longer actively circulating. The report's long list of Mac software is an alert that the Mac is now a much more enticing target for makers of adware and other scam software. It certainly can't be a coincidence that Apple is stepping up enforcement of its policies at the same time that the number of these sleazy apps is increasing.
There is also one very interesting observation in the Malwarebytes report that gives me pause, as someone who uses the Mac's unix underpinnings to drive a lot of automation:
We expect to see that trend continue in 2020 as Apple tightens the requirements and conditions for checking, code signing, and notarization. Since shell scripts are exempt from these restrictions, we expect to see them used more and more by malware.
I would imagine that future versions of macOS will make it harder to run arbitrary shell scripts, which is a bummer—but if that's where the scoundrels are heading, Apple's security team will have to chase them there. This is why we can't have nice things.
As the creators of anti-malware software, Malwarebytes is perfectly positioned to understand these trends, and their report is full of valuable information. At the same time, their business also potentially benefits if Mac users are more fearful about malware. And Malwarebytes's Mac expert, Thomas Reed, stoked those fears in an interview with Recode:
There is a rising tide of Mac threats hitting a population that still believes that ‘Macs don't get viruses,'' Reed said. 'I still frequently encounter people who firmly believe this, and who believe that using any kind of security software is not necessary, or even harmful. This makes macOS a fertile ground for the influx of new threats, whereas it's common knowledge that Windows PCs need security software.'
It's valid to wonder if the Mac's reputation for being a safe harbor leads some Mac users to make bad security choices. But 'Macs don't get viruses' is a statement that is still overwhelmingly true. Even if it makes it awfully hard to sell Mac anti-malware software.
If you appreciate articles like this one, support us by becoming a Six Colors subscriber. Subscribers get access to an exclusive podcast, members-only stories, and a special community.
